help with journal – Excelsior Writers | excelsiorwriters.com
– Excelsior Writers | excelsiorwriters.com

If you had been in charge of establishing the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), would you have included the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in DHS, or would you have retained it as an independent executive branch agency reporting directly to the president? What is one ramification of moving FEMA into DHS in terms of FEMA’s mission, programs, and reporting structure? Explain.

Your journal entry must be at least 200 words. No references or citations are necessary.

ORDER NOW – Excelsior Writers | excelsiorwriters.com
Humanities

Research Methods Short, sociology assignment help – Excelsior Writers | excelsiorwriters.com
– Excelsior Writers | excelsiorwriters.com

AT least 350 words and 1 reference

Assignment 1: Using the First Person in Research Writing

The use of personal pronouns (I, my, or we) in scholarly writing is an area of great contention in academia. Some say that the use of personal pronouns is a way of asserting your writer’s voice. However, others will discount the use of personal pronouns as inappropriate.

Your course textbook (Ridley, 2008) suggests that one way to assert your writer’s voice is to use personal pronouns in your scholarly writings. Additionally, the APA Style Manual recommends using “I” rather than the third person. However, the use of personal pronouns is often discouraged in academic writings.

In this assignment, you will explore the pros and cons of using personal pronouns in research writing.

Tasks:

On the basis of the course readings and the literature that you have reviewed for this course, in a minimum of 200 words, post your responses to the following:

• What are the pros and cons of using personal pronouns in scholarly writing?
• Why would most academic institutions not permit the use of these pronouns?
• Do you agree or disagree with this perspective that institutions hold? Why or why not?

ORDER NOW – Excelsior Writers | excelsiorwriters.com
Humanities

BSL4000 Keiser University Sexual Harassment Scenarios Discussion – Excelsior Writers | excelsiorwriters.com
– Excelsior Writers | excelsiorwriters.com

What Constitutes Sexual Harassment?

According to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination that violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature constitutes sexual harassment when submission to or rejection of this conduct explicitly or implicitly affects an individual’s employment, unreasonably interferes with an individual’s work performance, or creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment. There are two types of sexual harassment: quid pro quo and hostile work environment. Quid pro quo, which means “this for that,” involves a person with power over someone else who uses that power to either benefit or harm a person based on his or her willingness to participate in or tolerate some form of sexual behavior. A hostile work environment exists when an individual is exposed to conduct that is sexual in nature, severe and/or pervasive, and unwelcome or unwanted; a power imbalance may or may not exist.

Assignment: Read each scenario below, and then in an APA formatted Word Document explain each scenario and determine whether each constitutes sexual harassment, and explain why or why not. Be sure to utilize what you have learned about sexual harassment this week, and cite your sources and list your references.

SCENARIO ONE Mary and Bill work in the same department and have known each other for over a year. Mary and Bill are friendly, but nothing romantic has occurred between them. One day, Mary asks Bill if he would like to go out after work.

SCENARIO TWO Charles is attracted to his coworker, Shelly, but Shelly is unaware of the attraction. He tells her one morning, “You look really nice today.”

SCENARIO THREE At a company party, employees are called up individually to receive year-end bonuses. Susan is shocked to discover that whereas the men in her department receive cash, she and her female coworkers receive flowers.

SCENARIO FOUR Adam and a coworker are looking at a sexually explicit Web site. Someone walks in and sees the Web site. That person is offended and reports the incident to Adam’s supervisor, who never tells Adam about the complaint. The person walks into Adam’s office three more times in the next several months and again sees sexually explicit material on Adam’s screen. The person never tells Adam that he is offended.

ORDER NOW – Excelsior Writers | excelsiorwriters.com
Humanities

LOS345 University of Southern Maine Freedom Writers Film Analysis Paper – Excelsior Writers | excelsiorwriters.com
– Excelsior Writers | excelsiorwriters.com

I have uploaded the requirements for the paper. It can be on any film or on Lincoln, Selma, Erin Brochovich, Dead Poets Society, Secret Life of Walter Mitty, Hidden Figures, Elizabeth, Freedom Writers

I think you have everything it needs to be 2-3 pages not including the reference page.

Thank You

ORDER NOW – Excelsior Writers | excelsiorwriters.com
Humanities

LE300R Park University Combined Theory Paper – Excelsior Writers | excelsiorwriters.com
– Excelsior Writers | excelsiorwriters.com

Class – here are the instructions for the combined paper on the Philosophy of Humor (the Ethics part of the course) and the Psychology of Humor.

Because this assignment combined two papers formerly worth 95 points each, the point value is now 150 for the combined paper. The remaining 40 points will be added to the final Core Assessment Paper.

Instructions

Using the readings, lectures, classroom discussions and video presentations, create a short (minimum of four pages) paper in your own words and discuss the following:

Your understanding of the theories in Morreall’s Comic Relief book and your understanding of the theories and issues related to humor in the readings we have covered thus far in Martin’s Psychology of Humor book.

Discuss how the theories and readings compare with each other (how they are similar) and how they contrast with each other.

This paper should NOT be a movie review or a review of another commercial comedy product. You may use short (very short) references to movies or real life examples to illustrate a point, but devote the majority of your writing to the concepts of the theories. Do not use phrases like “box-office hit,” or “blockbuster movie,” or other phrases resembling movie reviews.

The paper must have at least four full pages of essay.

Criteria for Grading

Points

Paper is at least 4 or more pages long, not counting a cover sheet, abstract, or reference pages, and addresses all elements of the assignment.

0-35

Clearly describes theories and issues of humor in own words (not copied from lecture, books or other sources).

0-35

Compares and contrasts philosophy (ethics) and psychology theories with each other and demonstrates familiarity with course reading assignments.

0-35

Paper demonstrates critical thinking and the writing is interdisciplinary, integrated, and cohesive.

0-25

The writing is original, grammatically correct, and follows standard language usages and conventions.

0-20

Total Possible Points

150

ORDER NOW – Excelsior Writers | excelsiorwriters.com
Humanities