Which technological innovation was most important for early-nineteenth-century economic development, history homework help – Excelsior Writers | excelsiorwriters.com
Excelsior Writers | excelsiorwriters.com

STUDENT1 (jed):

4. Which technological innovation was most important for early-nineteenth-century economic development?


For this topic, I’ve decided to talk about the steamboat being a very important technological innovation during the Civil War. The significance of steamboats during that time period is mostly because the Union and Confederates starting to use them as a means of war on one another. Another big reason they were important is because they started using them to transport soldiers all over. The battle of Hampton Roads was referred to as the Battle of Ironclads, which were steamships.

This battle was fought over a two day period from March 8-9, 1862. This battle was an effort by the Confederate States of America to finally break the Union Naval Blockade, which completely blocked Virginia from any international trade. This would be the first time ever that steamships were going to be used for war. The two main ships used were the USS Monitor and the CSS Virginia, with other smaller ironclad vessels to be used as support for the mother ships.

Because of these two days of battle, the news spread to most world Navy’s who wanted to use these ships as prototypes to help their own Navy’s. The notable ship most would chose to use as a prototype was the USS Monitor. These ships were mainly made of wood, but France and Britain had ideas to produce stronger ships made of armor. While we don’t use steamboats for battle anymore, they were a very significant part of economic development during the 19th century.



  • Durkin, Joseph T.. Stephen R. Mallory: Confederate Navy chief. University of North Carolina; reprint, University of South Carolina, 1987; 1954. ISBN 0-87249-518-3.
  • Scharf, J. Thomas. History of the Confederate States Navy from its organization to the surrender of its last vessel; its stupendous struggle with the great Navy of the United States, the engagements fought in the rivers and harbors of the South and upon the high seas, blockade-running, first use of iron-clads and torpedoes, and privateer history. New York: Rogers & Sherwood; 1887; reprint, Random House, 1996

STUDENT 2(power):

This week I will answer the question could the War of 1812 be considered America’s second war for independence? I believe that the War of 1812 was the second war for independence based on the strategic significance of Baltimore and Fort McHenry. The War of 1812 took on one of the greatest Naval power known as Great Britain. America took a lot of costly loss more than personnel loss such as the burning of the nation’s capital. Although America took these losses it was due to the “repulse British invasions in New York, Baltimore and New Orleans, boosting national confidence and fostering a new spirit of patriotism.” (History). On September 13th 1814 Baltimore’s Fort McHenry was involved in a 25-hour battle which not only was a key turning point for the war of 1812 but also led to the birth of our national anthem as we know it. With the win at Fort McHenry costing only 5 soldiers their lives and the British forces turned away from flanking Baltimore through Washington D.C. the British left the Chesapeake Bay and gathered for an attack on New Orleans. With this it is no doubt that this was a second war for independence History.com tells us that ” Britain moved for an armistice after the failure of the assault on Baltimore. In the negotiations that followed, the United States gave up its demands to end impressment, while Britain promised to leave Canada’s borders unchanged and abandon efforts to create an Indian state in the Northwest. On December 24, 1814, commissioners signed the Treaty of Ghent, which would be ratified the following February. On January 8, 1815, unaware that peace had been concluded, British forces mounted a major attack on New Orleans, only to meet with defeat at the hands of future U.S. president Andrew Jackson’s army.” (History). In conclusion, this is why I believe and evidence shows the War of 1812 was the second war for independence from the British and their unreasonable trade laws and impressment.



James Madison and the War of 1812. Dir. History. Perf. Libby O’Connell and Ralph Ketcham. History.com. History, 2009. Web. 27 Dec. 2016.


Staff, History.com. “War Of 1812.” History.com. A&E Network, 2009. Web. 27 Dec. 2016.


ORDER NOW – Excelsior Writers | excelsiorwriters.com